Vijay Mallya said outside the London court Before joining Arun Jaitley, the finance minister had said that

Fugitive liquor businessman Vijay Mallya had met Arun Jaitley before leaving the country. Vijay Mallya said this before the London court.

Vijay Mallya said outside the London court

New Delhi: Fugitive liquor businessman Vijay Mallya had met Arun Jaitley before leaving the country. Vijay Mallya said this while outside London's Westminster Court. Mallya claimed that before coming out of the country, he had met Arun Jaitley. Mallya said, "I met Jaitley about settling the matter. I was ready to repay the outstanding debt of the bank, but banks questioned my settlement. Mallya said that I was made a scapegoat. There is a hearing in the London court about extradition of the liquor baron Vijay Mallya, which is about 9 thousand crores of banks. Explain that at the time Mallya left the country, Arun Jaitley was the finance minister. On the other hand, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley incorrectly denied Mallya. He said that Mallya misused the MP status. He said that I had met only 40 seconds for Mallya."

I met the finance minster to settle matters before I left. The banks had filed objections to my settlement letters: Vijay Mallya outside London's Westminster Magistrates' Court

— ANI (@ANI) September 12, 2018

Jaitley said that after 2014, he did not give Mallya time to meet, but Mallya tried to talk to him in the corridor of Parliament House while misusing his privilege as a Rajya Sabha member.

#WATCH Finance Minister Arun Jaitley says, "I never gave him an appointment" on Vijay Mallya's claim that he met the Finance Minister before he left. pic.twitter.com/aGxlD69NHY

— ANI (@ANI) September 12, 2018

In an article on Facebook, the finance minister described Mallya's statement in London as "factually incorrect". He said that in his statement 'there is no truth'. He has written, 'Since 2014, I have not given time to meet him and he does not have a question of his meeting.' According to Jaitley, being a member of Rajya Sabha, Mallya sometimes participated in the proceedings of the Parliament. The Finance Minister has written, "Once he took the wrong advantage of this privilege and when I was moving out of the house towards his room, he came quickly to follow me. On the go, he said that he has a plan to solve the debt."

Jaitley said, "While being fully aware of his earlier 'false offer', he did not give a chance to further the dialogue, I said, 'There is no use for talking to me and it is a matter of talking to banks Should be kept in front of me. ' The Finance Minister said that Mallya had some papers in hand, which he did not. Jaitley said that apart from the talk of this one sentence, he never gave time to this liquor trader.


The Congress has started encompassing the government on this issue. Congress on Mallya's claim that the government
Must have to explain how Vijay Mallya was given by India. Modi government to finance minister Jaitley
The details of the interviews will be given.

“भगौड़ो का साथ, लुटेरों का विकास” भाजपा का एकमात्र लक्ष्य है।

मोदी जी,

छोटा मोदी #1,छोटा मोदी #2,‘हमारे मेहुल भाई’,अमित भटनागर जैसों को देश के करोड़ो लुटवा,विदेश भगा दिया।

विजय माल्या, तो श्री अरुण जेटली से मिल,विदाई लेकर,देश का पैसा लेकर भाग गया है?

चौकीदार नहीं,भागीदार है! pic.twitter.com/2fA83FhvQc

— Randeep Singh Surjewala (@rssurjewala) September 12, 2018

Congress Chief Spokesperson Randeep Surjewala tweeted, "The development of robbers, along with the fugitives," is the BJP's only goal. Modi Ji, Chhota Modi # 1, Chhota Modi # 2, 'Our Mehul Bhai', Amit Bhatnagar, like millions of country looting and passing away abroad. Vijay Mallya, then Arun Jaitley, got away with the farewell, ran away with the country's money? Not the watchman, the partner!

Let us know that earlier in the hearing at the Westminster Court, Indian officials presented a ready cell video of Mallya in Mumbai's Arthur Road Jail. Earlier in July, the Judge of the Westminster Magistrate Emma Arbuthnot had said that Indian authorities had asked to deposit the 'serialized video' of Barrack No. 12 of Arthur Road Jail, to remove her 'doubts'. The Crown Prosecuting Service (CPS) had quizzed on behalf of the Government of India and had agreed to the video court. After this, the video of Arthur Road Jail was deposited in the court.